Star witness is prosecutor's good buddy who strategically leaked in hopes of having prosecutor appointed. Conflict? https://t.co/e574Di6nRn— Byron York (@ByronYork) June 12, 2017
I have no beef with Mueller, but he has zero business running an investigation in which his BFF is a witness/target. https://t.co/GDQriVA3g8— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) June 12, 2017
Mueller appt is looking like classic Comey set up: Comey Has Long History Of Questionable Obstruction Cases https://t.co/4rKQzVMrVG— Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) June 12, 2017
...One of the few media outlets that has consistently expressed skepticism about Comey is the Wall Street Journal. When he was nominated by President Barack Obama to be FBI director in 2013, they presciently wrote a piece headlined, “The Political Mr. Comey: Obama’s FBI nominee has a record of prosecutorial excess and bad judgment.” The article described even then Comey’s “media admirers” and a “media fan base” that refused to ask him tough questions. But the Journal had concerns:
Any potential FBI director deserves scrutiny, since the position has so much power and is susceptible to ruinous misjudgments and abuse. That goes double with Mr. Comey, a nominee who seems to think the job of the federal bureaucracy is to oversee elected officials, not the other way around, and who had his own hand in some of the worst prosecutorial excesses of the last decade....You might remember Martha Stewart being sent to jail. You might not remember that James Comey was the man who put her there, and not because he was able to charge her for anything he began investigating her for. The original investigation was into whether Stewart had engaged in insider trading. They didn’t even try to get her on that charge. Gene Healy wrote about it in 2004, warning about federal prosecutorial overreach:
Comey didn’t charge Stewart with insider trading. Instead, he claimed that Stewart’s public protestations of innocence were designed to prop up the stock price of her own company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, and thus constituted securities fraud. Stewart was also charged with making false statements to federal officials investigating the insider trading charge — a charge they never pursued. In essence, Stewart was prosecuted for “having misled people by denying having committed a crime with which she was not charged,” as Cato Institute Senior Fellow Alan Reynolds put it.The pursuit was described as “vindictive” in the New York Times and “petty and vindictive” in The Daily Beast.
But she still served a five-month prison sentence....
Judge Napolitano: Sessions In Dangerous Position, He Should Not Testify... https://t.co/7b9kkoFZCs— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) June 13, 2017