"At some distant point, investigators and the media will conclude that the nexus of wrongdoing was likely Barack Obama himself" |https://t.co/iPUf83xULx— Mike (@Doranimated) February 7, 2018
VDH : 'Obama allowed his DOJ and the FBI to manipulate the FISA courts to surveille an American citizen and indirectly target others.'— Imperator_Rex (@Imperator_Rex3) February 7, 2018
Read more at: https://t.co/9vRZ6sf3Xy
...Many questions remain, but Democrats, including Obama, are probably not going to look good when we get the answers. Some things still do not add up about the so-called Steele dossier, FISA warrants, the Nunes memo, and the hysterical Democratic reaction to it....
In this context, one of the final executive orders of the Obama administration takes on new significance. Shortly before leaving office, Obama abruptly issued yet another expansion of the Reagan-era Executive Order 12333, dramatically enlarging some 17 government agencies’ legal authority to surveille U.S. citizens — an order that had followed even earlier expansions of the number of officials privy to surveilled information. Why such a radical move in the last days in office? The practical intent of that order might have been inadvertently contextualized by Evelyn Farkas, a former assistant deputy secretary of defense. On MSNBC’s Morning Joe show, she blurted out: I was urging my former colleagues and — and frankly speaking, the people on the Hill, it was more actually aimed — aimed at telling the Hill people, “Get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can before President Obama leaves the administration.” Because, I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior people who left. So it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy that the Trump folks, the Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about their, the staff, the Trump staff’s dealing with Russians, that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would no longer have access to that intelligence. So I became very worried, because not enough was coming out into the open, and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia. So then I had talked to some of my former colleagues, and I knew that they were trying to also help get information to the Hill. What exactly did she mean by “how we knew what we knew..." ...
Here is my assessment of the Memo https://t.co/fM5N3MDJG2— Victor Davis Hanson (@VDHanson) February 3, 2018
In other words, everyone was scrambling for their promotions in the new Clinton Empire:— Tony Shaffer (@T_S_P_O_O_K_Y) January 30, 2018
Expected Clinton Victory Explains Federal Employee Wrongdoing | National Review https://t.co/T96Ff0rYjh
...Another, more helpful, exegesis, however, is to understand that if we’d seen a Hillary Clinton victory in November 2016, which was supposed to be a sure thing, there would now be no scandals at all....
Some have wondered why the recently demoted deputy DOJ official Bruce Ohr (who met with the architects of the Fusion GPS file after the election) would have been so stupid as to allow his spouse to work for Fusion — a de facto Clinton-funded purveyor of what turned out to be Russian fantasies, fibs, and obscenities? Again, those are absolutely the wrong questions. Rather, why wouldn’t a successful member of the Obama administrative aparat make the necessary ethical adjustments to further his career in another two-term progressive regnum? In other words, Ohr rightly assumed that empowering the Clinton-funded dossier would pay career dividends for such a power couple once Hillary was elected. Or, in desperation, the dossier would at least derail Trump after her defeat. Like other members of his byzantine caste, Ohr did everything right except that he bet on the wrong horse....
And Barack Obama? We now know that he himself used an alias to communicate at least 20 times with Hillary on her private, non-secure gmail account. But Obama lied on national TV, saying he learned of Hillary’s illegal server only when the rest of the nation did, by reading the news. Would he have dared to lie so publicly if he’d assumed that Trump’s presidency was imminent? Would he ever have allowed his subordinates to use the dossier to obtain FISA warrants and pass around and unmask the resulting surveillance transcripts if he’d seen Trump as the likely winner and a potentially angered president with powers to reinvestigate all these illegal acts?...
#TuesdayThoughts— Bradley Scott 🙏🇺🇸 (@Hoosiers1986) February 6, 2018
"Teams CLINTON & OBAMA were working with a foreign spy to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump." Senate Memo 2.0
When I think of the CORRUPTION we would NEVER have known about if Hillary had won, I IMMEDIATELY Thank GOD for @POTUS! 🙏https://t.co/da4dwHwgvT pic.twitter.com/prv8xlxft8
OHR SCANDAL: To call this Swamp behavior is to insult the Swamp. Tommy Boggs wouldn't have gotten involved with something this blatant. https://t.co/zaQ40ym0XV— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) February 7, 2018
The prospect of transparency has triggered panic in the Dems & among its praetorian guard in the media...when transparency hurts dems, the media oppose transparency...there's no excuse for w/holding this doc from the public. Claims to the contrary are just partisan noise #Tucker— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 2, 2018
BREAKING: Dossiergate looms as a factor in 2018 midterm elections, as 55% of independent voters say it was "likely" that the Obama administration— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) February 7, 2018
"improperly surveilled the Trump campaign during the 2016 election."https://t.co/DbRJmwmzMR