What the hell is this judge pulling?!?https://t.co/lwDRXL69uS— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) May 13, 2020
This is outrageous 👇https://t.co/ZO85ShpqVh— Bongino Report (@BonginoReport) May 12, 2020
Judge Sullivan, who denied leave to file amicus briefs when he knew third parties would have spoken favorably of Flynn, now solicits briefs critical of Flynn. This is a violation of the judicial oath and applicable ethical rules. We will be filing a complaint against Sullivan.— Cernovich (@Cernovich) May 13, 2020
Seriously.— Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) May 13, 2020
A federal judge is going to permit a group calling itself "the Watergate Prosecutors" to file an "amicus" brief arguing that the DOJ must prosecute someone it doesn't believe should be prosecuted?
For a felony?
"THE WATERGATE PROSECUTORS"?!
More on Flynn case -— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 13, 2020
Part of the "Watergate Prosecutors" group who filed a brief opposing the DOJ motion to dismiss is Jill Wine-Banks.
Ms. Wine-Banks is a Trump/Russia collusion nutter who claimed General Flynn would get "immunity for kidnapping"
Good job Judge Sullivan! pic.twitter.com/bgc7bA1elC
House Intel Committee Ranking Member: FBI ‘Doctored’ Flynn’s 302 Interview Form, And It’s ‘Missing’ https://t.co/gCKBcjOSkj— Thomas Paine (@Thomas1774Paine) May 13, 2020
Nevertheless, Sidney Powell Persisted https://t.co/rDNPoTiY3H— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) May 12, 2020
Flynn Defense Files Motion in Opposition to Amicus Briefs… https://t.co/jXF7iH3U1E— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) May 13, 2020
Flynn Update - @SidneyPowell1 responds to the idea of allowing let outside briefing on the DOJ motion to dismiss.— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 13, 2020
"The proposed amicus brief has no place in this Court."
"No further delay should be tolerated or any further expense caused to him and his defense." pic.twitter.com/ISDJoqljjp