“For people younger than 45, the infection fatality rate is almost 0%."— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) July 6, 2020
Stanford University's disease prevention chairman slammed using statewide lockdown measures as a response to the coronavirus, saying they were implemented based on bad data.
let's say it one more time:— el gato malo (@boriquagato) July 5, 2020
"discussing case counts without reference to testing levels is tantamount to lying."
let's look at just how much difference it makes.
i plotted raw "new positives reported per day" vs the same data adjusted for teasing levels.
big difference, huh? pic.twitter.com/aFQGVqjR8T
Hm, something’s missing… can’t quite put finger on it, but… 🤔 pic.twitter.com/DoOmuT8Wkm— Adam Baldwin (@AdamBaldwin) July 6, 2020